Methodology
How we track the manifesto. Read this before reading any verdict.
Why 40 manifesto items became 114 trackable promises
Source hierarchy
- 01Original manifesto / party release
- 02CAG Finance Accounts
- 03CAG Appropriation Accounts
- 04State Finance Audit Reports
- 05Government GRs / gazette / assembly records
- 06Department websites
- 07Scheme dashboards / MIS
- 08PLFS / CMIE / EPFO for employment-related claims
- 09RTI replies
- 10Credible media reports
- 11Citizen submissions, only after verification
What counts as fulfilment
What does not count as fulfilment
- A speech
- An announcement
- Foundation stone laying
- An MoU
- Budget allocation alone
- Expenditure alone
- Scheme launch alone
- Media quote without supporting data
Verdict definitions
Target met with strong public evidence.
Measurable delivery exists but the full target is not met.
Work, scheme, budget or construction exists but the target is not yet complete.
The policy change has been made, but citizen-level delivery still needs verification.
Public evidence reviewed so far does not prove fulfilment.
No reliable public evidence found in the first pass.
Promise has a long-horizon deadline that has not yet passed.
Information may be security-sensitive or not publicly disclosed.
Source mapping is incomplete; verdict will be issued after review.
Legal and editorial note
This tracker relies on publicly available records, official financial documents, government websites, scheme dashboards, media reports and RTI responses where available. A promise is not marked fulfilled unless target-specific evidence is publicly traceable. Absence of public evidence does not automatically prove non-implementation, but it does mean fulfilment has not been publicly demonstrated.